home >> HLS >> what do they test?
WHAT DO THEY TEST?
We have many examples of pointless experiments carried out at HLS, but the ones we feature here are amongst the most striking. Remember every drug or product that is withdrawn because of serious side effects, every pesticide that proves to be carcinogenic, every stupid 'new and improved' household product that we don't need, Huntingdon will have forced that product down the throats of thousands of animals and then passed it safe just for it later to go on to maim, harm and kill humans.
MUSHROOM EXTRACT
This 2008 study is another fine example of HLS’ so-called ‘life saving research’. A type of mushroom known as Agaricus blazei Murrill was tested on animals! During the experiment, extract of the mushroom was forced down the throats of seven week old rats (a procedure known as ‘oral gavage’), who were later killed and dissected.
“Two females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day died or were killed due to an accidental mis-administration of the test formulation, since there was trauma … and a Control male also died.”
As seen in the quote above, even in HLS’ own documents they admit to sloppy procedures and deaths of animals as commonplace. How better to sum up this experiment than to quote from HLS themselves; “In the 13-week repeated dose toxicity study, ABM-FD [mushroom extract] did not cause any clinical finding…”. In other words, they learnt absolutely nothing from the experiment.
 |
pdf of mushroom extract paper |
CLEANING CHEMICALS
HLS conducted yet another ‘life saving’ experiment in 2004 on pregnant rats; this time, testing the chemical n-Propyl bromide. What HLS fail to mention in their experiments is that this chemical is a “solvent used for the cleaning of metal surfaces, removal of soldering residues from electronic circuit boards, and as an adhesive solvent”.
This chemical has been under dispute for many years and a vast array of experiments have already been conducted on rats in an attempt to establish whether it has an effect upon the health of adult humans and unborn babies.
During this experiment, HLS forced pregnant and lactating female rats to inhale the chemical in varying doses by placing them in tube-shaped inhalation devices not much bigger than their bodies. This was not only to see the effect on the mother rats but the unborn and already weaning babies. The rats, numbering over 50 adult females and numerous babies, were forced to inhale this substance for a total of 31 days. Once the experiment was completed, the rats were all killed and dissected to have their internal organs weighed and examined.
This chemical has been in use for many years, with large amounts of workers having already been exposed to it. Debate still remains in both scientific and industry arenas over the safe level of exposure; while one paper clearly shows that rats have fertility problems when exposed to the chemical, others prove it to be entirely safe.
In effect, groups and health protection bodies are arguing over which toxicity category to place the chemical, pointing out continuously that there is “insufficient evidence”.
Finally, the Health and Safety Executive of the UK (UK HSE) sum up this problem by pointing out:
“...it is not possible to judge which studies provide the most relevant model for humans.”
|
pdf of cleaning chemical paper |
SPLENDA
Splenda is the brand name for Sucralose and is made by Mcneil Speciality Products who are in turn owned by Johnson & Johnson.
In 2000 a series of reports were published by Permagon press detailing how thousands of animals had been experimented on at Huntingdon to test an artificial sweetener sucralose. These were particularly nasty experiments carried out on dogs, monkeys, rabbits, rats and mice. 12,800 animals died at HLS during this study.
One of the aims of the experiments was to see the effect on the central nervous system of the animals and in turn the animals were given massive doses of sucralose. Serious questions have been raised as to the safety of sucralose yet here it is widely available in many service stations, Pret a Manger and Starbucks to name a few outlets. We invite anyone reading this to enter sucralose or splenda into a Google search and read the detailed and widespread evidence on the dangers of sucralose.
In the Home Office's own guidelines primates are only to be used for 'serious' studies. These experiments amongst many others make a mockery of this. Animals died for what? Sugar.
We can all sleep safely in our beds at night knowing that kind people at Huntingdon Life Sciences are testing for our childrens' safety and for their future...oh and if you believe that you need your head examining.
Click here to read the Daily Mirror article about HLS testing Splenda.
CARAMEL FOOD COLOURING
In the May 1992 edition of Food Chemical Toxicology an experiment was reported at Huntingdon that involved poisoning mice with Caramel at "very high doses" in spite of the fact that caramel has been on the market for many decades.
|
pdf of caramel colouring research paper |
STARCH DERIVITIVE
In 1994 Huntingdon tested cyclodextrin which is a starch derivative. This was tested on dogs and rats for one year. All the animals were killed at the end of this experiment.
|
pdf of starch research paper |
CIGARETTES
In an edition of the Toxicologist magazine in 1998 it described how Huntingdon had tested nicotine on rats and rabbits. Convulsions and tremors were recorded in both species.
In a toxicological magazine published in 1990 Huntingdon carried out tobacco experiments on rats. These were done by the particularly nasty method of Inhalation toxicology which means that the animals are forced to breath in the fumes like the ones pictured.
CANNABIS
In a report published in 1999 called Marihuana (sic) and Medicine it details an experiment carried out on 84 pregnant rabbits at Huntingdon to test cannabis.
This experiment lasted one month and all the animals were killed whilst still pregnant.
MUSK
In 2000 Huntingdon published an experiment for three kinds of Musk which is a perfume used in cleaning products, toiletries and perfumes. These experiments were carried out on rats.
This is inhalation toxicology. This is a promotional picture from a lab infiltrated by SHAC and in this picture the dogs are only breathing fresh air. The reality is very different, there are no people sitting between the dogs comforting them, the animals would be breathing anything from the fumes from burning foam to the vapours from aerosols and glues. The animals would keep on breathing these fumes often until they pass out, vomit or in numerous cases drop down dead in the slings.
|
pdf of musk research paper |
